By: halicon
So is iBurst publicly admitting that they were involved in an unconstitutional large scale medical experiment?
View ArticleBy: Chris
I love iBurst! People didnt have enough to complain about and instead of going to court and proving / disproving that the tower is responsible for all the “ailments” in the area, they switch it off. No...
View ArticleBy: n3ptun3z
I have to admit, that was a stunning coup from iBurst! I will however agree with their position not to refute that these ailments actually exist, and a serious investigation needs to be done to confirm...
View ArticleBy: Wogan
I don’t know what they’re complaining about. I’d love the chance to live that close to an iburst tower.
View ArticleBy: halicon
@Chris No thanks Chris. I don’t think companies should perform illegal large scale medical experiments on me without my knowledge, nor build their ugly towers without following proper process. I know...
View ArticleBy: Robert MacLean
@halicon – where does it say that iBurst did “perform illegal large scale medical experiments”? I read that they did the responsible thing of shutting the tower down, in case it was at fault and when...
View ArticleBy: halicon
@Robert if iBurst chose to lie about when the tower is off, and are using this as their evidence that the tower does not cause health issues, they have performed an experiment on people without their...
View ArticleBy: Robert MacLean
@halicon – 1) ah I follow your logic now (re: medical experiment). 2) What proof do you have that they are lying or not lying about the time and dates the tower was off? (assuming that is what your...
View Article
